Search for: "J. DOES, 1-99"
Results 1 - 20
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2014, 2:59 am
Does 1-99, No. 13 C 2375, Slip Op. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
Does 1-99, No. 13 C 2501, Slip Op. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
R 27a does not then apply, because the application does not contain any sequences, despite the fact that the invention refers to nucleotides or amino acids. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am
The appeal complies with the requirements of Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 99 EPC and is therefore admissible.2. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
In this respect, the appellant invoked the principle of good faith or protection of legitimate expectations and cited the allegedly pertinent decision J 14/94. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
A copy of pages 99 and 100 of the EPO publication "How to get a European patent - Euro-PCT, Guide for applicants Part 2", 7th edition 2014, was enclosed.XI. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:15 am
Pursuant to Rule 99 EPC the notice of appeal has to contain the name and the address of the appellant (Rule 99(1)(a) EPC), an indication of the decision impugned (Rule 99(1)(b) EPC) and a request defining the subject of the appeal (Rule 99(1)(c) EPC). [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am
The appeal complies with Articles 106 to 108 EPC and Rule 99 EPC and is admissible.2. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
T 220/83 [4] and T 177/97 [1]; affirmed by numerous decisions, and in particular recently by T 573/09 [1.1]).Whether the requirements of A 108, third sentence, in conjunction with R 99(2) are met has to be decided on the basis of the statement of grounds of appeal and of the reasons given in the contested decision (see, e.g., J 22/86 [2]; T 162/97 [1.1.2]).Exceptionally, it has been acknowledged that “the requirement for admissibility [laid down in A 108, third… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
These decisions deal with withdrawals from a withdrawal of an application.J 1/11In J 1/11, the application under consideration was filed as an international application and then entered the European phase. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
J opined that O.V. clearly falls into the category of "high risk" and "does pose a danger to society." [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:42 am
Diese Vorgehensweise kann erhebliche Probleme nach sich ziehen, da mit dieser Bekanntmachung der Lauf der Einspruchsfrist gegen das erteilte Patent ausgelöst wird, Artikel 99 (1) EPÜ. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
The appeal complies with Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 99 EPC and is therefore admissible.2. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
The appeal complies with Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 99 EPC and is therefore admissible.2. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of an… [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
It complies with the requirements of Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 99 EPC.Request for correction under Rule 139 EPC2. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
J 37/89 [3.5]). [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:13 am
The appeal complies with the requirements of Articles 106-108 and Rule 99 EPC and is therefore admissible.2. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
ENDA: Religious Freedom and Employment Discrimination, 23 Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law 1-37 (2016).Vincent J. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:05 pm
National Collegiate Athletic Association, Docket SCWC-15-0000663, J. [read post]
